Arc is currently under active redevelopment, so it is repeatedly made public and private — availability may be intermittent during this period.
ARC vs Threema

Arc vs Threema

Swiss, paid, anonymous — Arc adds post-quantum + disappearing.

Threema is a respected, audited, anonymous Swiss app with a one-time purchase and no ads. Its main gaps versus Arc are post-quantum cryptography (still research-stage) and granular ephemerality. Arc adds both, plus free E2EE for everyone.

Updated 2026-06-02 · evaluated by Claude Code Opus 4.8 Ultracode

Head-to-head score

Scores from the same independent 9-axis, 100-point rubric used across all 20 messengers. Higher is better.

Arc

Arc

89 / 100

Threema

72 / 100

AxisArcThreema
Crypto1816
Fwd/Bwd Secrecy1413
Post-Quantum142
E2EE Coverage1212
Sender Privacy37
Registration Privacy910
Ephemeral115
Verification UX44
Multi-Device43

Why choose Arc over Threema

01

Post-quantum today: Arc enforces PQXDH (ML-KEM-1024) in production, while Threema's ML-KEM work (with IBM Research) is still research, not deployed (Post-Quantum 14/14 vs 2/14).

02

Dual-layer ephemerality (IGF 3-tier + Mutual Burn) — 11/11 vs Threema's 5 — with timed deletion across every device and server.

03

E2EE is free for everyone on Arc; Threema is a paid app. Plus BLE Mesh offline messaging.

What Threema does well

  • Threema has an excellent privacy record: Cure53 audits, formal verification, an anonymous Threema ID (no phone or email), and Swiss jurisdiction with one-time pricing and no ads.
  • Registration privacy (10/10) is on par with Arc.

The bottom line

Threema (72) is a top-tier privacy app and a fair fight on anonymity. Arc (89) pulls ahead with production post-quantum cryptography, dual-layer disappearing messages, and free E2EE for everyone.

Get Arc — E2EE, free for everyone

See the full 20-messenger comparison

How Arc's encryption works