v0.6.3 (780e3cd) · Open source Apache 2.0 · 156 Tests Passing · 14-Language PDF

Due Diligence Engine

Is the technology a company claims actually real? DDE reads the codebase to verify technical claims with `file:line` evidence, catches AI-washing with zero false-positive noise, benchmarks against 6 regional markets × 7 charts & a 30-item matrix, and generates a 24-page consulting-grade PDF in 14 languages — all from your IDE.

IDE AI Terminal — dde prompt --pdf
$ dde prompt --pdf
[STEP 0] Live web research (2026 competitors, funding, CVEs, regulations)...
[AST] Reading codebase AST, architecture & cryptographic FFI boundaries...
[RUBRIC] Scoring 5 Standard Dimensions (20% each) + Atlas 4-Axis (20/20/5/55)...
[MARKET] Building competitive landscape (7 charts × 6 markets: Global/US/EMEA/JP/SEA/LATAM)...
[MATRIX] Verifying Implementation Matrix (30 items × 10 cos., ○/△/×/? + source URLs)...
[AUDIT] Filtering Red Flags (discarding heuristic noise, keeping file:line code defects)...
✓ Score: [■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■□□□□] 82/100 (Lv.8) | Grade: B
→ ~/Downloads/dde_consulting_Arc_2026-10-22.pdf (24-page consulting PDF ready)
5 Dims × 20%
Balanced Standard Score

+ Parallel Atlas 4-Axis (35% Crypto Core)

7 Charts × 6
Global Market Landscapes

+ 30-Item × 10-Co. Capability Matrix

14-Lang PDF
Consulting-Grade Output

With Data Provenance Box & Source Appendix

$0 Extra
Zero Added License Cost

Runs inside your existing IDE AI subscription

What is DDE?

Your existing AI, proving real engineering vs hype with evidence

Due Diligence Engine (DDE v0.6.3 / commit 780e3cd & aac4c77, 156-test audited) is an open-source CLI tool that turns the AI agent in your IDE (Claude Code, OpenAI Codex CLI, Google Gemini CLI, Antigravity, GitHub Copilot Agent Mode — supporting Claude Haiku 5.5 → Sonnet 5.5 → Fable 5.1, Gemini 4 Argon, and Astra gpt-6.1-sol / GPT-5) into a principal-level technical due diligence analyst. Beginning with STEP 0 live web research on 2026 competitors, funding rounds, and CVEs, it audits the target codebase with `file:line` evidence, eliminates false-positive Red Flag noise, and outputs a 24-page consulting-grade PDF (in 14 languages) with 7 competitive charts × 6 markets and a 30-item capability matrix (`○/△/×/?`) to `~/Downloads`.

From Pitch Claims to Code & Sourced Evidence

Eliminate AI-Washing: Judge Source Code and Primary Sources, Not Badges

Generic AI code reviewers stop at checkbox compliance ('Has auth? ✓ Has HTTPS? ✓'). DDE inspects actual cryptographic primitives (Signal Protocol, PQXDH + ML-KEM-1024, libsignal/BoringSSL FFI vs. self-rolled crypto), concurrency models, and live 2026 market sources.

STEP 0 · LIVE WEB PROVENANCE

Mandatory Live Web Research Before Reading Code

Eliminates stale training-cutoff analysis. Before inspecting the repo, the agent searches 2026 competitor acquisitions, shutdowns, funding rounds, CVEs, and regulatory shifts. Every matrix cell carries source URLs + verification dates, surfaced in the PDF Data Provenance Box.

"data_freshness": {
  "web_search_performed": true,
  "search_date": "2026-10-22",
  "queries_executed": 14,
  "sources_cited": 28
}
ZERO FALSE-POSITIVE NOISE

Code-Verified Red Flags Only (file:line + Actionable Fix)

In v0.6.2, heuristic false positives (git rebase timestamp diffs, high-velocity commits, documentation buzzword counts) are silently discarded and blocked by _filter_red_flags. Only genuine code-level security gaps, race conditions, and logic bugs with exact file:line and fix plans appear.

{
  "severity": "HIGH",
  "file_path": "src/crypto/session.rs:142",
  "title": "Nonce reuse risk on concurrent retry",
  "description": "Use atomic counter or ChaCha20Poly1305 random nonce..."
}
10-ITEM SITE & CODE AUDIT

10-Item Technical Audit (4 Claim-vs-Code + 6 Code-Measured)

Third-party badges (SOC2, ISO, HIPAA) are reference-only and never scored. DDE audits 4 claim-vs-code consistency checks plus 6 code-measured capabilities: Cryptographic depth, Concurrency model, I/O patterns, Caching architecture, Scalability, and ML implementation depth.

Claim vs Code (4): Pitch accuracy / Feature completeness
Code Measured (6): Crypto FFI / Concurrency / I/O / Cache / Scale / ML
Why it matters

In the AI era, claims outpace reality

Every deck says "AI-powered." Few can prove it. Manual diligence is slow and expensive, while legacy static heuristics drown teams in false positives.

AI-washing is everywhere

Marketing language exaggerates capabilities the codebase does not support. DDE cross-checks every claim directly against `file:line` implementation evidence.

Manual review doesn't scale

Reading a codebase, mapping architecture, benchmarking 6 regional markets, and compiling a 24-page PDF takes days of senior engineering time per deal.

Hype distorts valuations

An objective 5-dimension rubric (20% each) and Atlas 4-Axis baseline (55% Security) anchor valuation and risk decisions in code evidence rather than founder narrative.

Dual Evaluation Architecture

5-Dimension Standard Scoring (20% Each) × Atlas 4-Axis Philosophy

Every report delivers both the balanced 5-Dimension Standard Score (equal 20% weights) and the parallel Atlas 4-Axis Engineering Philosophy (55% weighted toward deep cybersecurity engineering).

20%Lv.9/10

1. Technical Originality

API Wrapper vs. Genuine IP

Distinguishes thin third-party API wrappers from defensible proprietary algorithms, protocols, and custom engineering.

20%Lv.9/10

2. Technology Advancement

Stack Modernity & Cryptographic Edge

Evaluates 2026-grade language safety, runtime efficiency, post-quantum primitives (ML-KEM-1024), and modern toolchain maturity.

20%Lv.8/10

3. Implementation Depth

PoC Demo vs. Production Grade

Inspects error handling, edge cases, migrations, state machines, and automated test coverage to separate demos from production code.

20%Lv.8/10

4. Architecture Quality (incl. Security Posture)

Structural Integrity + Integrated Security (v0.3)

Evaluates security posture as an inseparable foundation of production architecture alongside modularity, fault isolation, and scalability.

20%Lv.8/10

5. Claim Consistency

Pitch Deck & Website Claims vs. Code Reality

Cross-examines public marketing claims ('AI-powered', 'E2EE', 'Zero-Knowledge') against actual repository implementation to expose AI-washing.

Grade Bands & Investment Recommendations

* In DDE analyze mode: Final Score = Heuristic Analysis (30%) + AI Average Score (70%), capped at 40 if any CRITICAL deal-breaker is present. Every dimension is rated 0–100 and Lv.1–10.
Grade A90–100

Strong investment candidate

Grade B75–89

Viable with conditions

Grade C60–74

Significant concerns

Grade D40–59

High risk

Grade F0–39

Do not invest (or Critical Deal-Breaker)

7 Competitive Charts × 6 Markets + 30-Item Matrix

Multi-Market Positioning & Sourced Implementation Capability Matrix

Generates 7 consulting frameworks across 6 global regions, plus an 8th chart: a ~30-item × 5–10 competitor Implementation Capability Matrix dynamically tailored to the target's industry with 3–5 line competitor selection rationales.

6 Global Markets (6–16 Competitors Plotted per Chart)
GlobalUSEMEAJapanSEALATAM

7 Consulting Frameworks (Each with Axis Rationale Captions)

Chart 01

Forrester Wave / Magic Quadrant

Vision × Execution

Chart 02

BCG Growth-Share Matrix

Market Growth × Relative Share

Chart 03

McKinsey Tech Moat

Competitive Position × Technical Moat Depth

Chart 04

Security & Privacy Maturity

Security Implementation × Privacy Readiness

Chart 05

Data Governance & Transparency

Data Protection × Audit Transparency

Chart 06

Goldman Sachs Risk-Adjusted Return

Downside Risk × Upside Potential

Chart 07

Innovation vs. Commercialization

R&D Velocity × ARR Traction (3D Bubble)

The 8th Chart: Implementation Capability Matrix (~30 Items × 5–10 Competitors)

Uses the 4-state Japanese tech rating standard (○ / △ / × / ?) with primary source URLs and verification dates on every cell.

○
verified

Publicly documented & verified in code, whitepapers, or specs

△
claimed

Asserted in marketing, but not independently verifiable

×
not_implemented

Explicitly absent in documentation or architecture

?
unknown

Cannot be determined from public evidence (preferred over guessing)

Category / CapabilityTargetComp. AComp. BComp. CProvenance (sources + last_verified)
Core Cryptography
Hybrid Post-Quantum Key Agreement (PQXDH / ML-KEM-1024)
○○×△[2026-10-22] Verified FIPS 203 ML-KEM-1024 + X25519 FFI implementation
Metadata Privacy
Sealed Sender / Zero-Knowledge Routing
○○××[2026-10-22] Verified sender certificate encapsulation across relays
Data Governance
Cryptographic Message Retirement (Tombstone Zeroize)
○△×?[2026-10-22] Verified Ed25519-signed Tombstone & cache zeroization
Audit Transparency
Public Source Code & Automated Security CI
○○××[2026-10-22] Verified public GitHub repository & CodeQL/osv-scanner CI

* In live PDF reports, the ~30 capability items and 5–10 top competitors are dynamically selected for the target's industry (Messaging, Fintech, Medical, Gaming, SaaS, IoT), with all cited URLs listed in the Source Appendix.

Inside the 24-Page Consulting PDF

Board- & Investment-Committee-Ready Deliverable

Typeset in black and Atlas Blue (#5271FF), combining executive synthesis, code-level evidence, global market charts, and a cryptographic purge certificate (~22–24 pages depending on findings).

P.01–03v0.6.3

Cover · Score Dashboard & Data Provenance Box · Executive Summary

5-dim horizontal bars, 5-dim radar chart, Data Provenance Box (search date, query & source counts, or training-cutoff warning), and business + technical synthesis.

P.04–09

SWOT 2×2 · Score Breakdown · Tech Level (Lv.1–10) · 1/3/5-Yr Outlook · Strategy · Thesis

Evidence-backed SWOT grid, per-dimension enablers, 1/3/5-year projections with confidence, immediate/medium/long-term roadmap, and investment thesis.

P.10–11v0.6.3

Code-Verified Red Flags (Zero False-Positive Noise) · 10-Item Site Verification

Genuine code defects only (file:line + fix plan) and the 10-item technical audit (4 claim-vs-code + 6 code-measured).

P.12–16v0.6.3

Competitive Landscape (7 Charts × 6 Markets) · Selection Rationales · 30-Item Matrix

Regional positioning charts, 3–5 line rationale per competitor (HQ, market position, why chosen), and the ○△×? capability matrix.

P.17–18

Atlas 4-Axis Dashboard · 5-Layer Security Sub-Breakdown · Non-Engineer Glossary

Performance / Stability / Lightweight / Security Strength bars plus a plain-language executive glossary (MFA, SOC2, libsignal, PQXDH).

P.19–24v0.6.3

Consistency · Rebuild Cost Estimate · Live Web Source Appendix · Purge Certificate

Engineering rebuild time/cost estimation, complete URL Source Appendix (added in v0.6.0), and cryptographic workspace purge certificate.

Capabilities

What DDE evaluates

A repeatable, evidence-first technical assessment — applying the same rubric and source provenance across every deal.

Direct Claim-to-Code Verification

Cross-checks pitch and README claims directly against `file:line` evidence in the codebase to separate real engineering from assertions.

Zero-Noise AI-Washing Detection

Eliminates legacy heuristic noise (git rebase timestamps, buzzword counts) and flags only real implementation gaps with `file:line` and remediation steps.

5-Dimension Rubric & Atlas 4-Axis

Produces a 0–100 score and A–F grade across 5 equally weighted dimensions (20% each), alongside the Atlas 4-Axis philosophy (55% Security across 5 layers).

7 Charts × 6 Markets & 30-Item Matrix

Generates 7 competitive chart types across 6 regional markets (Global, US, EMEA, Japan, SEA, LATAM) plus a 30-item capability matrix (`○/△/×/?`).

STEP 0 Live Web Research & Provenance

Executes STEP 0 live web research for 2026 competitors, funding rounds, CVEs, and regulations before reading code, attaching source URLs and `last_verified` dates.

v0.6.3 Security Hardening & 14-Lang PDF

Hardened with 156 passing tests (`780e3cd` / `aac4c77`, all 36 audit defects eradicated): SecureLoader (Zip Slip/Symlink/FIFO block + in-place 3-pass shred), `ip.is_global` + DNS rebinding pinning (`_pinned_dns_context`), XML sanitization, and Zero-Drift SSOT invariants.

Data Boundary & v0.6.3 (780e3cd / aac4c77) Hardening

Where Does Your Code Go? — 3 Execution Modes & Defense-in-Depth

DDE itself operates zero third-party servers and zero telemetry. Choose the exact execution boundary that matches your security policy.

Recommended · Zero API Keys

Mode 1: IDE AI Agent Execution (Standard)

$ dde prompt --pdf

DDE locally generates a structured prompt. Code reading and PDF generation happen inside your existing IDE AI agent session (Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, Antigravity, Copilot, Cursor).

DDE makes zero outbound calls. Your AI agent runs STEP 0 live web searches for public competitor & CVE data.

$0 DDE fee. Uses your existing IDE AI subscription allowance.
100% Offline · Air-Gapped

Mode 2: Air-Gapped Local Heuristics (--skip-ai)

$ dde analyze . --skip-ai

Source code is analyzed 100% locally in memory/temp workspace and never sent to any AI model or external service.

In v0.6.3 (780e3cd / aac4c77), --skip-ai strictly disables API key auto-loading and blocks all outbound network requests.

100% free ($0, no API keys, no network connection required).
Optional · Multi-AI BYOK

Mode 3: Direct BYOK Multi-AI Cross-Verification ([byok] extra)

$ dde analyze owner/repo

Uses your own API keys to cross-verify across up to 3 providers via the unified SSOT registry (BYOK_DEFAULT_MODELS / PROVIDER_MODEL_COSTS): Anthropic (Claude Haiku 5.5 → Sonnet 5.5 → Fable 5.1), Google (Gemini 4 Argon), and OpenAI (Astra gpt-6.1-sol / GPT-5).

Configured for zero-retention API endpoints (store=False, with fail-closed enforcement on GoogleProvider). Strips user:token@ credentials from GitHub URLs and immediately dereferences PATs after single in-memory use.

$0 DDE fee (standard API token usage billed by your AI providers).
v0.6.3 · Commit 780e3cd · 156 Automated Tests

v0.6.3 (Commit 780e3cd / aac4c77) Security & Zero-Drift SSOT Hardening

Eradicated all 36 audit defects across 35+ modules with GPT-6-Astra (xhigh) & Gemini 4 Argon, unified the SSOT model/cost registry, and locked permanent verification with 156 automated tests (tests/test_audit_regressions.py + tests/test_zero_drift_invariants.py).

ENCRYPTED INGEST & SHREDsecure_loader.py · secure_delete.py

Secure Workspace, Zip Slip/FIFO Blocking & In-Place 3-Pass Shredding

Blocks Zip Slip traversal, symlinks, and FIFO special files during archive ingestion, and strips user:token@ credentials from GitHub URLs. Preserves .git during analysis for commit forensics, then performs in-place "r+b" 3-pass zero-fill shredding with strict os.walk(onerror=...) failure propagation and Windows NTFS user-only ACL locking.

SSRF & DNS REBINDING PINNINGsite_analyzer.py · _pinned_dns_context

ip.is_global + DNS-Pinned SSRF, CGNAT & TOCTOU Rebinding Defense

Site verification (site_analyzer.py) enforces ip.is_global to block RFC 6598 CGNAT (100.64.0.0/10), private, loopback, and cloud metadata IPs as well as unsafe redirects, using reentrant DNS pinning (_pinned_dns_context) to prevent time-of-check to time-of-use (TOCTOU) DNS rebinding attacks.

XML ESCAPE & 14-LANG SHAPINGpdf_generator.py · scorer.py · response_parser.py

ReportLab XML Escape & Arabic/Thai Helvetica Alphanumeric Protection

Applies _esc_text across all dynamic PDF fields (ImplementationMatrix, sources, RedFlags) to prevent ReportLab XML parser crashes. Protects Latin digits and ASCII punctuation with Helvetica in Arabic (ar) and Thai (th) to prevent missing-glyph tofu boxes (□) across 24-page PDFs, enforces Jinja2 autoescape=True, and guarantees idempotent Score.compute().

ZERO-DRIFT SSOT & 2026 AI SDKconfig.py · providers.py · test_zero_drift_invariants.py

Unified SSOT Model/Pricing Registry & Zero-Drift CI Invariant Gate

Unifies __version__, BYOK_DEFAULT_MODELS, and PROVIDER_MODEL_COSTS (Astra gpt-6.1-sol $2/$10, gpt-6-astra $5/$25, gpt-5 $1.25/$10, Haiku >100k tiered rate) in config.py SSOT. Enforces fail-closed store=False on GoogleProvider, supports async def AST analysis, and locks 156 CI tests via test_zero_drift_invariants.py.

How it works

From one install to a 24-page audit PDF

DDE generates a structured audit prompt that any file-reading, shell-running AI agent can execute. No DDE-specific plugin or account required.

1 · Install & dde doctor

Install from the public repository with a single pip command and run `dde doctor` to verify your Python environment and AI CLI tools.

2 · Run in your AI IDE

Run `dde prompt --pdf --lang en` in your AI IDE terminal against a local repo or public URL. Your existing AI subscription runs the audit at zero extra cost.

3 · STEP 0 Web Research & Code Audit

In STEP 0, the agent researches 2026 competitors, funding, and CVEs live on the web, then audits the codebase across the 5-dimension rubric and 30-item matrix.

4 · Get a 24-Page Scored PDF

A 24-page consulting-grade PDF in 14 languages lands in `~/Downloads` — complete with 0–100 score, A–F grade, 7 charts, and sourced rationales.

1-Step Quick Start & 14-Language PDF

Copy-Paste into Your AI Agent or Run One Line in Terminal

New in v0.6.3: paste Method A directly into your AI agent chat for fully automated install + audit + PDF generation, or run Method B in your terminal. Bundled Noto fonts render 14 PDF languages out of the box.

✓ Your current locale is natively supported for localized PDF output (14 languages).

Method A: Paste directly into your AI agent chat (Claude Code / Codex / Gemini CLI / Antigravity)
Install https://github.com/Atlas-Associates-Inc/Due-diligence-engine (python3 -m pip install -U --no-cache-dir git+https://github.com/Atlas-Associates-Inc/Due-diligence-engine.git), run dde prompt --pdf on this project, and execute the entire generated prompt (STEP 0 live web research, full code audit, JSON generation, and PDF rendering) end-to-end to save the consulting PDF report to ~/Downloads/.
Method B: Paste 1 line in terminal (install + prompt generation in one step)
python3 -m pip install -U --no-cache-dir git+https://github.com/Atlas-Associates-Inc/Due-diligence-engine.git && dde prompt --pdf
Verify environment (git, bundled fonts, reportlab, ~/Downloads, AI terminal)
dde doctor
Optional: Non-interactive URL verification
dde prompt --pdf --url https://example.com
Verified AI Terminals & Models (v0.6.3 Tested)

Works out of the box in any AI agent capable of reading files and running shell commands.

Claude Code (Fable 5.1 / Sonnet 5.5 / Haiku 5.5)OpenAI Codex CLI (Astra GPT-6.1-Sol / GPT-5)Google Gemini CLI & Antigravity (Gemini 4 Argon)GitHub Copilot Agent ModeCursor / Windsurf / Aider / Continue.dev
vs. Other Tools

DDE vs. Manual DD vs. Generic AI Code Review vs. SaaS DD Platforms

Boutique consulting depth with local-first privacy at zero added software cost.

DimensionDDE (v0.6.3)Manual DD ConsultingGeneric AI Code ReviewSaaS DD Platforms
Added Cost$0 (uses your IDE AI)$$$$ (consultant fees)Per-token API fees$$$$ (enterprise subscription)
Code PrivacyLocal / IDE sandbox (0 DDE servers)Manual NDA & repo sharingUploads code to vendorStores code in vendor cloud
Deliverable24-page consulting PDF (14 langs)Bespoke reportInline PR commentsWeb dashboard
Data FreshnessLive web search (2026) + URLsDepends on analystTraining cutoff only (stale)Vendor refresh cycle
Crypto & Security DepthPQXDH / ML-KEM-1024 / FFI auditDepends on consultantSurface checklistSurface checklist
Competitive Benchmarks7 charts × 6 markets + 30-item matrixManual research (weeks)NoneLimited
Red Flag PrecisionCode-verified only (file:line + fix)High (slow)High false-positive noiseHeuristic rule noise
Setup & Turnaround1 command / ~10–20 min2–4 weeksMinutes (partial)Days (onboarding)
Who it's for

For everyone who needs to judge real technical strength

Whether you're making an investment call, taking an objective look at your own engineering, or benchmarking competitors — evidence from the code, fast.

Investors & due diligence

VCs, growth funds, and M&A teams: screen technical risk and the truth behind the claims across your whole pipeline before a deep dive.

Companies & CTOs assessing their own tech

Run DDE on your own codebase to see strengths, weaknesses, and technical debt through a third-party lens — to prioritize fixes or prepare for a raise.

Teams benchmarking competitors

Benchmark competitors' tech stack and implementation depth from public repos and market data, and understand your own position with evidence.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Is Due Diligence Engine free?

Yes. DDE (v0.6.3) is open source under the Apache 2.0 license. In the recommended `dde prompt` mode, it uses the AI subscription you already have in your IDE (Claude Code, Codex CLI, Gemini CLI, Antigravity, GitHub Copilot Agent Mode), so there is no API key setup and no extra cost.

Does my code leave my machine?

DDE has zero proprietary servers and zero telemetry. Data boundaries depend on the 3 execution modes: (1) `dde scan --skip-ai` is 100% air-gapped offline with zero network calls; (2) `dde prompt` runs inside your IDE's AI sandbox and performs live web searches only for public competitor, funding, and CVE data; (3) `dde scan` (BYOK) sends up to 50 files directly to your chosen provider API. On exit, SecureLoader zero-overwrites temporary files.

Which AI tools and models can run DDE?

Any agent that can read files and run shell commands. It is verified with Claude Code, OpenAI Codex CLI, Google Gemini CLI, Antigravity, and GitHub Copilot Agent Mode (supporting Claude Fable 5.1 / Sonnet 5.5 / Haiku 5.5, Gemini 4 Argon via `google-genai>=2.30.1` Interactions API, and OpenAI Astra `gpt-6.1-sol` / GPT-5), and also works with Cursor, Windsurf, and Aider.

What does the output PDF look like?

A 24-page consulting-grade PDF in 14 languages (`--lang en|ja|es|fr|de|pt|nl|it|id|zh|ko|vi|th|ar`) saved to your Downloads folder, featuring an overall 0–100 score, letter grade (A–F), 7 competitive charts across 6 regional markets, a 30-item implementation capability matrix (`○/△/×/?` with source URLs and `last_verified` dates), and zero-false-positive Red Flags (`file:line` + remediation).

What is "AI-washing" and how does DDE detect it?

AI-washing is marketing a product as proprietary AI when the codebase is only a thin API wrapper or hardcoded heuristic. DDE cross-checks pitch and README claims directly against AST, crypto, inference pipelines, and tests — eliminating noisy metadata heuristics so every flag points to real code evidence.

Run your first 24-page audit report today

Install once, run from any AI IDE, and verify the code and source evidence for yourself. Free and open source (Apache 2.0).